30
SICK
BUILDING
SYNDROME:
NATURAL
DAYLIGHT CASE STUDY
Shabnam Akbari Namdar1 and Solmaz Tabe Afshar
1Assistant Professor, Department of Architecture, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran
2PhD student, Department of architecture, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran
ABSTRACT: In the taxonomy of creatures, human is a complex being, a feature that
makes him vulnerable, such that if he lacked the power to reason and intelligence, he
would certainly not be able to deal with the threats of the nature. Creating a shelter, from
Research Article
its primitive form for cave dwellers to today's luxurious buildings, all point to the man's
PII: S238315531900005-8
need for privacy that primarily guarantees his security, but a closer look at this physical
boundary between man and nature, which is known as residence, reveals that there are a
plethora of problems, questions, and requirements besides security, ranging from the
extent to which nature suffers as a result of construction to the health problems that this
demarcation creates for humans. Evidently, not being attentive to the environment will
result in health problems, but since sustainable architecture is not necessarily considered
a moral obligation to care for the health of residents, developing building regulations and
design policies with an emphasis on human health seems essential. One of such problems,
whose consequences are clearly noticeable in current societies and families, is the lack of
access to natural daylight as a result of increased unorganized constructions and
regardless of environmental conditions, and ultimately the emergence of dysfunctional
buildings for their residents in the community, which in turn will eventually bring about
irreversible physical and mental problems. In this article, the notion of “Sick Building
Syndrome” (or SBS for short), and its underlying causes are reviewed by conducting a
series of studies on authoritative and up-to-date sources, articles, and books. Here, the
role that natural daylight plays as one of the major elements whose lack or absence will
lead to the formation of a sick building in society, along with the factors and elements
contributing the increased prevalence of this type of building are studied in the scope of
architectural designing. The authors believe that identifying the reasons for the rise of
acute health problems in our current society and promoting builders and architects to use
appropriate and low-cost solutions, will greatly alleviate these problems.
Received: 08 Aug. 2019
Revised: 25 Nov. 2019
Published: 15 Dec. 2019
Corresponding author’s E-
KEYWORDS: Sick Building Syndrome, SBS, Daylight, Architecture & Health,
Architectural Design
INTRODUCTION
occupants of the building experience discomfort and
even severe health problems proportional to the
The term “syndrome” is derived from the Greek
language, essentially meaning concurrence, while
today, it mostly refers to a group of symptoms which
consistently occur together [1].
duration of residence in the building, even when a
specific illness or cause is not identifiable [2].
SBS is often related to the problems in indoor air
quality, among which the most effective factors are
often in fact a combination of potential factors,
including indoor air pollution, lack of sunlight and
daylight, poor ventilation and heating, poor
acoustics and the presence of pathogenic elements
such as asbestos. Biological contaminants are also of
concern, for example, lack of sunlight along with
high humidity provides grounds for the formation of
molds and fungal contaminations [3].
If one wants to achieve optimality in design,
harmony with nature should be primarily pursued,
where humankind first found its origin a few
thousand years ago. In the meantime, sunlight and
daylight are heavily involved in keeping us in touch
with nature while inside the building. Although this
may seem simple and obvious at first, it would be
Sick Building Syndrome (SBS) was recognized as
a
medical condition by the World Health
Organization in 1982. The World Health
Organization defines SBS as a group of nonspecific
symptoms including symptoms such as eye, nose
and throat irritation, mental fatigue, headache,
nausea, dizziness and skin irritations among other,
some of which appear to be related to working or
SBS should not convey the notion that the
building itself is sick, but that the people in it may
have one, some, or all of the symptoms that falls into
SBS as per the definition offered by World Health
Organization. Sick Building Syndrome is an
umbrella term used to describe situations in which
Citation: Akbari Namdar Sh and
S Tabe Afshar
(2018). Sick building syndrome: natural daylight case
Journal of Art and Architecture Studies
study. J. Art Arch. Stud., 8 (2): 30-36.
ISSN 2383-1553
JAAS
J. Art Arch. Stud. 8(2): 30-36, Dec 15, 2019